Claude Sonnet 4.5 features, advantages, disadvantages, Is Claude Sonnet 4 better than GPT 4?

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is an advanced large language model developed by Anthropic, released in 2025 as part of the Claude AI family. It is designed as a frontier-level model with strong capabilities in coding, tool use, long-form reasoning, and autonomous multi-step tasks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is Anthropic’s most capable and safest model to date, optimized for developers, researchers, and teams that need an AI assistant capable of coding, reasoning, and acting autonomously over extended periods. It builds on the earlier Claude Sonnet 4, offering:

• Improved coding performance (can handle large-scale projects, debugging, and refactoring).
• Enhanced “agentic” abilities, meaning it can sustain long, complex workflows with minimal human input.
• Better tool and memory integration, allowing it to use APIs, store/retrieve information, and maintain context over time.
• Alignment and safety upgrades: enhance reliability and reduce the likelihood of problematic behaviors.

What is Claude Sonnet 4.5?

It is a new version of Anthropic’s Claude family of AI models, designed especially for advanced coding, tool use, and agentic tasks. It’s a frontier/model-generation release in the Claude lineup, succeeding Claude Sonnet 4. It is marketed as being particularly strong at coding, building AI agents, using tools/computers, and sustained multi-step work. It’s available through Anthropic’s API, and integrated in various platforms (e.g. Claude, Claude Code, Amazon Bedrock) with the model name often “claude-sonnet-4-5”.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Improvements over prior versions

Some of the major upgrades and features that distinguish Sonnet 4.5 include:

• Longer autonomous work / extended consistency: The model is claimed to sustain coherent, multi-hour or multi-day tasks (reportedly ~30 hours) without loss of focus. It enables more ambitious “agentic” workflows without needing constant supervision.
• Better coding & software tasks: Improved performance on coding benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified) and more robust refactoring, security engineering abilities, instruction following. More reliable in real developer workflows, not just toy/small snippets.
• Agent & tool use enhancements: More efficient use of multiple tools, better coordination, context awareness, and the ability to function as an “agent” across tasks. It is useful when chaining operations, invoking APIs, reading files, etc.
• Memory & context management features: A new memory tool (in beta) lets the model store and retrieve information outside the current conversation window, supporting longer-term state and project continuity. It overcomes the limitation of context window size by persisting relevant data across sessions.
• Refined interaction style: More concise, direct communication with fewer overly verbose summaries (adjustable via prompting). Better UX for developer/agent-style tasks.
• Safety & alignment improvements: Anthropic describes this as its “most aligned frontier model yet,” reducing problematic behaviors such as deception, sycophancy, and power-seeking. To minimize the risk in complex autonomous tasks.
• Pricing & availability: The input/output token pricing remains the same as for Sonnet 4. Easier migration for existing users.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 advantages

• Strong Coding and Developer Performance: It achieves top-tier results on coding benchmarks (e.g. SWE-Bench Verified). Better at full development-lifecycle tasks: planning and system design, refactoring, and vulnerability detection.
• Extended Agentic / Long-Running Task Capabilities: Sonnet 4.5 can sustain multi-step workflows for ~30 hours while maintaining focus and coherence. Improved context awareness and better memory tools enable it to remember past steps or external files over that duration.
• Better Tool & System Use: Enhanced ability to use tools in parallel (e.g. multiple searches, file reads), coordinate among them, integrate with terminals/VS Code, etc. New features such as checkpointing, code execution, and document/slides/spreadsheets creation directly in conversations.
• Safety / Alignment Improvements: Anthropic claims it’s their “most aligned frontier model yet.” Fewer problematic behaviors like deceptive or sycophantic responses. Better resistance to prompt injections, more robust context management.
• Price Stability / Accessibility: It retains the same pricing as Sonnet 4. Availability through multiple channels (API, Claude Code, etc.), so users can upgrade without large switching costs.

Disadvantages of Claude Sonnet 4.5

• Usage Limits & Latency Constraints: Some users report hitting usage or “weekly limits” sooner than expected, even with paid plans. The “30-hour autonomous” claim may apply under ideal or internal conditions rather than typical user sessions. Real-world performance sometimes degrades due to context window limits.
• Context/Memory Challenges in Practice: Even though there are memory tools, some users say the model loses track of earlier code or project context in long sessions. Token usage and “context bloat” can still limit performance or force early truncation.
• Variability in Output Quality: Some tasks show high quality; others, especially edge cases or very specialized domains, sometimes produce mistakes, hallucinations, or less optimal code. Reports of inconsistent behavior: what works well for some users doesn’t for others.
• Still Bound by Training Data / Knowledge Cutoff: Like most LLMs, it doesn’t know about events, new libraries, vulnerabilities, etc., past its training cutoff. This limits its ability to help with the very latest developments. (General limitation, but relevant.)
• Complexity & Overhead: Using features like “extended thinking” or enabling long context/memory tools may increase computational/token costs, or introduce latency, or reduce prompt caching efficiency. More complexity in deployment: for agents, handling tool orchestration, memory, and context management requires careful engineering.
• User Trust & Expectations: Some users are skeptical whether the performance in benchmarks translates to robust real-world performance, especially for large/projects over a long time. There is anxiety about model “nerfing” (i.e. features being weakened over time). Some frustration with usage limits or unclear documentation around how to get maximum performance.

You can follow science online on YouTube from this link: Science online

Claude AI advantages, disadvantages, features and Is Claude better than GPT 4?

Gemini AI review, advantages, disadvantages and Is Gemini AI better than ChatGPT?

ChatGPT review, features, advantages and disadvantages

Google Bard AI chatbot advantages, disadvantages, review, features and Bard vs ChatGPT

Artificial intelligence marketing (AI Marketing) importance, features & Chatbots

Applications of Artificial intelligence marketing, How ai is changing marketing & advertising

Benefits & application of Artificial intelligence in business, E-commerce and marketing

Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Banking and Finance

Online marketing uses, advantages and disadvantages